Ithiyori 1 (endiyithandayo): Ityala Seinfeld , aka the idle id id. Andifuni ukuthi ndikuxelele njalo, kodwa kwizimvo zam ezininzi zoku Seinfeld kunye nokulula kwayo, nokuzincoma kwayo kula maphepha (nabani na ukhumbule i-Can't Stand Seinfeld Umbutho ndiwuqalisile?), Bendisoloko ndikhankanya ugculelo lomboniso wenkcubeko yabantu bamanye amazwe, eyafikelela Leya , aba bantu banjalo eyahlukileyo kuthi.
Umahluko awuzange uthethe umdla; ezahlukeneyo zihlala zithetha ubudenge kwaye ziyahlekisa. Ingqondi enjalo! Ihlala ikhuselwa ngendlela yokuziqhayisa njengomceli mngeni onobukroti kunye nesibindi sokuchaneka kwezopolitiko. Ngaba kunokwenzeka ukuba ngandlela thile yile matrix yokuhlekisa kancinci okunike ilayisensi kuMnumzana Richards?
Ewe, kukuzolula, nangona oku yayikukucinga kwam kokuqala emva kokuba ndivile ngesi sehlo. Kodwa kufanelekile ukuthi umntu wokuqala endimaziyo ukuba ayiprinte le -thiyori-okanye kwi-intanethi, kunjalo-wayengumbhali uCharles P. Pierce Ithemba laseMelika Yelog yeWebhu, TAPPED.
Ndibukele [ Seinfeld ixesha elide ngokwaneleyo, uMnu. Pierce wabhala, ukuze aqonde ukuba kukho ububi obuninzi obugqithisileyo obuqhubeka embindini walento — ngokungacacanga ngobuhlanga kunye nohlanga lwabemi, enezinyo elingaqondakaliyo elihlekisayo. Silahlekile, kodwa ilizwe lizele ngabalahlekileyo abakhulu, kwaye uninzi lwabo lubonakala lwahlukile. Ho, ho…. [W] umnqwazi endawubonayo [ngomsindo kaRichards wobuhlanga] yayiyi-Id ekhutshiweyo yommandla kamabonakude obunyanisekileyo uRichards wayeyinxalenye yawo (akekeliswe sithi).
Kulungile, bendicinga, nangona isekhona isuntswana wolule. Kuyinyani ukuba bekukho icaricature yobuhlanga-e-ngokobuhlanga kaJohnnie Cochran. Ayisiyokuba awunakho ukwenza i-caricature uJohnnie Cochran, kodwa oku kwabhalwa ngendlela elula kunye neziqhwala UAmos 'n' UAndy indlela. (Kwaye njengokuba omnye wabaphawuli be-TAPPED esongeza, bekukho ubungqina bomhlekisi waseSpain uDanny Hoch malunga nokubuzwa Seinfeld kwaye uxelelwe ukuba enze indlela yakhe yokubonisa ukuba ibe yinto ecekeceke ngakumbi kwaye ikhethe ngokungathandekiyo.)
Ewe kunjalo, kufuneka kuthiwe uMichael Richards ngokwakhe akazange abhale iziqendu zokuhlekisa. Ininzi yemveliso kaJerry Seinfeld kunye noLarry David (oqhubeka nokuziqhelanisa nokuziqhayisa, ehlekisa ngeenkcubeko ezihlala zikhohlakele kwaye ezikhohlakele kumdlalo wakhe). Umnumzana uPierce's Kramer-okhuphe-id-of- Seinfeld Ithiyori ibonisa ukuba uMnu.Richards-ongenasiphoso naif, njengoKramer-ngandlel 'ithile wangenisa okanye wafaka ngaphakathi inkcubeko ezizimeleyo ngokwedelela ubuhlanga obugcwele ukubhalwa komboniso. Kwaye yayilithambeka elimtyibilizi lokuqhambuka kobuhlanga kwiFektri yeLaugh.
Oku kuya kubandakanya…
Ithiyori No. 1 / Inxalenye A: Ubeka ityala uJerry kunye noLarry David. Oku kunesibheno esithile kum (kuba ndihlala ndisiva ukuba uMnu.David unesikhumba esibhityileyo xa ephendula kwizimvo zobukrelekrele bakhe). Kodwa ngandlela thile, le Subpart A ithiyori inika uMnu. Richards uxanduva lokuziphatha ngentetho yakhe enentiyo. Imenza unodoli nje, isithethi somlomo kwicala elimnyama lenkcubeko yaseSeinfeldian.
Ngendlela, ngaphambi kokuba sishiye ithiyori engu-1 kunye no-1 / iSiqendu A, bekukho into ethandabuzekayo yokusabela kwisithuba sikaMnu. Pierce esiphakamise imibuzo evuselelayo malunga nokwamkelwa kwenkcubeko kweentlobo ezithile zomdlalo wokuhlekisa. Kwakunxulumene nendlela uMnu. Pierce wayila ngayo uhlaselo Seinfeld .
Ucacise ukungayithandi kwakhe le nkqubo ngokwenkcubeko / ngokwembali ngokuthi: Emva phaya xa uSam Kinison ongasekhoyo wayenyathela amanqanaba kwaye esoyikisa abantu… yayinguJerry owakhutshwa ngamajoni enkcubeko ukuthomalalisa umphunga wabo wobuntombi, ngokwenza iziqhulo ezikhuselekileyo ngesiriyeli kunye nezinto ezinjalo.
Ngelixa ndinokuthatha umba ngalo mbono weBhunga eliFihlakeleyo leeNkcubeko ze-Hegemonists ezimisela ukuba yintoni abantu abaya kujoliswa kuyo ukuze bafumane ukuhlekisa, uhlaselo lukaMnu. Pierce lwavela kwelinye icala. Wabizwa ngaphandle ngabafazi ababini kwi Ithemba blog (Garance Franke-Ruta kunye no-Adele M. Stan) njengomzekelo we-misogyny ngasekhohlo-kuba wasebenzisa igama lokuba yintombazana, kwaye ngenxa yokuba wayebonakala edumisa uSam Kinison. (Bathi umdlalo ohlekisayo uyingozi, kodwa ukugqabaza kumdlalo wehlaya ngokwenene yingozi.)
Ityala lokugxekwa kwezimvo zika Mnu. Pierce kubonakala ngathi lihleli kwiingcinga ezimbini: ukuba umdlalo weqonga kaKinison wawungamanyani ngaphandle kokuba malunga I-misogyny, nditsho nokugxekwa kwe-misogyny. (Ukuqhaqha kukaKinison, ukuvuza amathe, ukunganyanzelwa kwe-fat-slob persona yayingenguye oyena mzekelo ubalaseleyo.) Enye ingcinga yeyokuba nokuba kukhuthazwe ukungaziphathi kakuhle okanye ukugxekwa kwisenzo sikaKinison, uMnu.Pierce kufuneka ngandlel 'ithile abe yimpazamo yokuhlekisa ngaye. , okanye ngokudumisa ngokungagungqiyo uKinison ngokumbiza ngokuba woyikisayo kwaye uyingozi xa kuthelekiswa nentombazana Seinfeld .
Ngokomntu, ndikufumanisa kunzima ukukholelwa ukuba uMnu. Pierce wayencoma uKinison kuba yena bonwabele I-misogyny kunokuba, yithi, ukonwabela ukonwaba ngokugculelwa.
Kukho ityala lokujonga umdlalo weKinison njengesihlwayo: Ngaba umntu ukholelwa ukuba wayefuna ngokwenene ukubulala abangenamakhaya? Ewe, umntu unokujonga uKinison ngelensi efanayo ukuba umculi wobufazi uBarbara Kruger ujonge uHoward Stern: Uyayithanda okanye akathandi, nantsi umntu oxela (ubuncinci inxenye) yenyani engeyiyo ngamadoda.
Ndingavuma apho babenjalo abantu-iintlobo ze-boy-head-frat-boy-abahleka uKinison ngezizathu ezingezizo. Kodwa ngaba elinye ipolisa kufuneka libe ngumculi weempendulo zabanye abalandeli bakhe? Ngaba umntu uyakuphepha ukuhlekisa ngolu hlobo kuba kukho umngcipheko wokuba umntu angayihleka ngenxa yezizathu ezingalunganga? Okwangoku, umntu akanakuphika ukuba abo bantu bagxeka uKinison banokuziva bebuhlungu ngokwenyani yingcinga yokuba abanye abantu bamfumanise ehlekisa, kwaye iimvakalelo ziyinyani, njengoko besitsho. Ke akukho mpendulo ilula, kodwa uMnu.
Okwangoku, ndicinga ukuba ukuthelekiswa kukaMichael Richards noSam Kinison akulunganga kuKinison, nangona kunjalo ...
Ithiyori engu-2 ibandakanya: ngokusisiseko, ukuba uMnu.Richards waye (okanye ezama ukuba) ngu-Sam Kinison, kodwa oko, waqhula ngesiqhulo . Le ngcamango ingasenza sikholelwe ukuba uMnu. Richards wayedlala kwaye ukubhenca ubuhlanga kunokuba uziqhelanise. Ndifumanisa ukuba le yinto entle, edla ngokungaqiniseki (jonga isahluko sam Umrhwebi waseVenice phakathi Iimfazwe zikaShakespeare , apho ndixoxa khona ngempikiswano yokuba umdlalo awuchasananga namaSemite kodwa endaweni yokuchasana namaJuda).
Ayizukusebenzela nje uMnu. Richards (owazama ukufaka ibango kuLetterman ukuba wayesenza uhlobo oluthile lwejusi ngeN-gama). Hayi emva kokuba ubonile ikliphu yeYouTube yokuhleka kwakhe kweFektri, kunye nobutshaba bobuhlanga obuqinisekileyo abubonakali ngathi bubukrakra, oko akubonakali ngathi yinto parodied kodwa kungcono kumiselwe ngokuzimisela okubulalayo.
Kodwa uthini malunga nethiyori engu-3, iDavid Letterman Thesis: Blame Borat. Kwingqumbo yakhe yobusuku ngobo busuku wayenabo uJerry Seinfeld kwaye uMnu Seinfeld walungiselela ukuba uMnu.Richards enze imbonakalo yakhe emhlophe, enesiporho, nesiphuphutheki, ecela uxolo, uMnu.
Ndicinga ukuba into awayeyiyo yile Borat Umboniso bhanyabhanya, ngandlela thile wadala imeko evumayo yokubonisa lonke uhlobo lwezithuko, ubuhlanga, inkolo kunye nezokwabelana ngesondo, ezithathwa ngandlela thile njengezithunyelwe ngokufanelekileyo, ngaloo ndlela zisemthethweni ukusetyenziswa kwazo, kwaye uMnu. Richards ' Ukuqhuma kwakubonakalisa le mozulu ingenampilo. (Ndiyibeka ityala kuBorat.) Nokuba loo nto okanye uMnu. Letterman wayehlekisa ngayo yonke loo nto kunokuba bubukrelekrele. Okanye zombini. Kunzima ukuxelela xa uDave ekumgangatho wakhe ongaqondakaliyo.
Kunokubakho into kwingxoxo yemeko-bume evumayo, nangona ndicinga ukuba uSacha Baron Cohen ngokucacileyo ufuna ukwenza izinto ezinkulu zibukeke zibi-okanye ubuncinci ngokungathethekiyo sisidenge-nomntu wakhe, ngelixa uMnu. Richards wabonakala ngathi uza ngqo entliziyweni, kunye akukho mntu ubandakanyekayo-inene, wayengubani. Ngaphandle kokuba ufuna ukukholwa…
Ithiyori No. 4: Ukuzikhathaza. Isiseko sento enokubizwa ngokuba yi-Borating kukuba umhlekisi / umkhohlisi ufumana indlela yokuveza ububi, ubuhlanga okanye ubundlobongela obujamelene nobuso obuqhelekileyo babantu abaqhelekileyo, kungenjalo babonakala behle. Ukuzikhathaza kuya kuba yindlela yokuxhokonxa ukubonakaliswa, ngokuzazi okanye ngokungazi, ngenyaniso embi malunga ngokwakho .
UMnu. Richards wayesitsho kwingxelo yakhe yokuqala emva kokugqabhuka — amagqabantshintshi ngendlela ekumangalisa ngayo ukufumana oku ngaphakathi nangokuba kuphuma njani kum nendlela le nto ifike ngayo kum ibinjengololiwe wempahla-yinto awayeyenzile ngokwakhe oko wakwenziwe nguBorat, yithi, kubantu abathobelayo base-Arizona bacule ukuba bacule Phosa umJuda phantsi kweQula. Babengengabo abachasene namaSemite ngaphezulu, kodwa bakrwece loo ndawo kunye nento abangayaziyo elele ngaphakathi kubo iyavela. Ukuzibetha ngokwakho kuthetha ukuba uMnu.Richards wayezikrwempa ngokwakhe. Ukuzihlamba ngaphandle. Ukanti luhlobo lokubaleka koxanduva lwakhe.
Andiyithengi. Kodwa ndicinga ukuba kukho umahluko okhoyo kuyo onokuthi uthethe into eyinyani malunga nesiganeko. Ingayinto…
Ithiyori No. 5: Beka ityala likaJerry elingavulelwanga. Le yayiyinto umhlobo wam uStanley Mieses ayizisa kwincoko yomnxeba: Ukuba uJerry wayengalugcinanga luvaliwe ucango, utshilo uStanley. Wayethetha ngomnumzana Richards ’shtick on Seinfeld : UKramer ugqabhukile engacaciswanga ngomnyango wendlu ongavulwanga kaJerry.
Oko kukuthi, uStanley ucacisile, uKramer ngewayengazange abe nguKramer-kwaye uMnu.Richards ngewayengazange abe luhlobo lwenkwenkwezi enkulu ecinga ukuba ungaphezulu kokukhwaza kwiklabhu yamahlaya- ukuba ibingazange ibekho ngenxa yokugqabhuka- emnyango-kaJerry-we-shtick.
Ngesizathu esithile, uninzi lwaseMelika luthathe isigqibo sokuvuma ukuba ukungena kweKramer yokungena kweminyango yayi-super-super-hilarious. Jonga indoda ehlekisayo iyangena kwakhona emnyango! Mna ngokwam bendisoloko ndixinekile kula manyango acaphukisayo kunye noKramer ekucingelwa ukuba wacky persona, kodwa bendimbalwa. Ngokucacileyo, ubukho buka Mnu.Richards bonke, ubomi bakhe kunye nethamsanqa lakhe, waye-wayokufika kwisiganeko sobuhlanga-esachazwa sisityholo sakhe sokuhlekisa esingena ngomnyango ongatshixwanga.
Kwaye yajonga isikweko, umbono kaStanley ucebisa ukuba, kwenzeka ntoni eqongeni lale klabhu yamahlaya yayilucalucalulo olungena ngomnyango ongatshixwanga. Iingcango ezingatshixwanga zilungile, kucingelwa ukuba zibonakalisa ukungabikho kwezithintelo. Mhlawumbi yile nto yayisenziwa nguMnu.Richards -ukubulala iintsholongwane-ngokungazi okanye ngokungazi: ukuvumela iingcinga ezi-rancid ngaphakathi kugqabhuke umnyango oshiywe ungatshixwanga.
Kodwa mhlawumbi iingcango ezingatshixwanga azisoloko ziyinto elungileyo. Mhlawumbi kukho izinto ezithile ezifanele ukuthintelwa ngokutshixa. Isifundo abanye esisifumene kwisigqibo sika Mnu.Richards kukuba sonke sineengcinga zobuhlanga kwigumbi elithile elingenamanzi esihlala silitshixa kunye nesitshixo. Andivumi ngokuqinisekileyo, kodwa ndicinga ukuba mhlawumbi licebo elilungileyo ukugcina olo cango lutshixiwe.
